Like many people my age, the Kennedy assassination is
something that seemed like the beginning of a whole lot of things that have
gone wrong in our country. I was too
young to know “where I was when I heard President Kennedy was shot” but old
enough to remember my parents sadness (they were ardent supporters) and
watching the funeral on our black and white Philco TV. Although I’ve seen the documentary footage so
many times I can’t remember, my bona fide memory is my mother pointing out to
me the boots pointed backwards in the stirrups of the horse (representing
Kennedy as a fallen warrior) and I remember the whipping I received from my
mother because I kept standing in front of the TV when she was trying to watch
it! There were many social forces afoot
in the 60’s (Vietnam, Civil Rights, Women’s Lib, Experimental Drugs and the
Sexual Revolution) that would have happened anyway, but from the perspective of
a kid, it seemed after President Kennedy died then things sort of went crazy. In retrospect I’m glad they did, because by
the time I was old enough to get caught up in things, everyone was tired of
crazy and just wanted to dance and make money.
Yes, my generation’s great rebellion was disco music (or is it a social
contribution?). That said, I recently
finished Bill O’Reilly’s Killing Kennedy
and want to recommend it to anyone who lived through the times or is too young
to remember but curious about why JFK was so popular and yet was assassinated
before completion of his first term.
I’ve read a few books about Kennedy but this one is unique because it
tells the story of JFK and Lee Harvey Oswald (his assassin) and what was going
on in both their lives from Inauguration day in 1961 through November 22, 1963
when their lives connected for 9 fateful seconds. There are no revelations in the book but
there are some incredibly interesting details that are supplied as the story
unfolds. O’Reilly obviously leans in the
“lone gunman” direction, but I think deftly leaves the door open for the
possibility of there being a wider conspiracy.
In typical O’Reilly fashion, he is judicious in making sure we put our
weight down on the known facts, even though there are some other more sinister
possibilities. What struck me most about
the book was that like so many other fateful days in history, the weather
played a major role. When Kennedy went
to his first event in Ft. Worth on November 22, it was raining, but as his
plane touched down in Dallas (only 32 miles away) the weather had cleared and
the sun was shining. This led the
decision to not install the bubbletop on the Presidential limousine which fully
exposed him. Had Kennedy not worn a
backbrace, he would have survived the first shot because it would have knocked
him forward. But instead it did its job
and held him rigidly in place while Oswald got the second and fatal shot in. On the other side of the equation, had
Oswald’s wife held her resolve and not taken him back for the third time or if
the Cuban embassy had not rebuffed his application to immigrate several months
prior, he probably wouldn’t have been anywhere near Dallas that day. But, it didn’t happen that way . Once again we learn that the big events of
history are all resourced in the small, daily choices we all have to make and
sometimes these small things can change the world or at least our own lives in
the time it takes to take a breath. I
would add a personal correction to Mr. O’Reilly with regards to the point he makes
about Mr. and Mrs. Kennedy’s last dinner party in the White House before going
to Dallas. In wanting to point out the
macabre irony of the dinner party including activities where Abraham Lincoln’s
body was prepared and then viewed by friends, family, and associates nearly a
century before, he forgets that the entire White House was gutted during the
Truman administration and only the outer shell is original. Thus they were not the actual rooms, but
rather the approximate places these things happened.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment